6 studies / 54 · Łódź, an area separated from the ghetto
Przemysłowa Street in Łódź: Violence against Children in a German Camp
December 1942 – January 1945 · Torture, maiming and killing of defenceless people
The camp at Przemysłowa Street was intended for Polish children deprived of their families' protection and of rights. Alongside hunger and forced labour, there was a system of punishments, beatings and humiliation. Maria Prusinowska-Migacz's testimony makes it possible to identify a specific female perpetrator of violence. At the same time, current research requires rejection of old, repeatedly inflated numbers of prisoners and deaths. [1] [2] [3]
Editorial account based on the sources listed below. Sources checked: 5 September 2026.
- Victims and toll
- According to the Museum of Polish Children, about 2,000–3,000 children were imprisoned and nearly 200 died; detailed mortality estimates differ.
- Perpetrators
- German security police and camp staff; commandant Friedrich Camillo Ehrlich and guards, including Eugenia Pohl (Pol).
- Documented methods
- beating and humiliating children · forced labour · starvation and confiscation of food · isolation and camp punishments
Why children were imprisoned
The Museum of Polish Children states that the camp was created on 1 December 1942 and that the first children arrived ten days later. Those sent there included children burdened by their parents' activities, refusal to sign the Volksliste, orphanhood or accusations such as vagrancy. Even infants were imprisoned. The commandant was Friedrich Camillo Ehrlich. [1]
Violence remembered by a survivor
The IPN cites Maria Prusinowska-Migacz's testimony concerning Eugenia Pohl. The guard made the release of a food parcel conditional on crawling and kissing her feet. Refusal ended in beating with a stick and kicking. This is an account of a concrete act of abuse, not merely a general label for camp conditions. In 1974, Pohl was sentenced by a Łódź court to 25 years' imprisonment. [2]
A system of punishments and a cautious total
The museum description lists hard labour, starvation rations, theft of parcels by staff, cold and illness. Punishments included beatings, restriction of food, isolation and assignment to a penal company. The museum estimates 2,000–3,000 children imprisoned and nearly 200 deaths; records were partly destroyed. [1]
Tomasz Toborek identifies 76 surviving death certificates and a cautious estimate of one hundred and several dozen deaths. The difference from the museum's rounded figure must remain visible. The old figure of 12,000 prisoners gives no basis for calculating thousands of deaths by subtracting the number of survivors. Each figure describes a different category of records or estimate. [3]
Limits of the findings
There is no complete nominal total. The museum's 'nearly 200' and the estimate of 'one hundred and several dozen' must not be presented as an identical established number. Testimony about Pohl's violence does not attribute to her all camp deaths. [1] [2] [3]
Sources and notes
-
opracowanie muzealne. Fakty o obozie / Facts about the camp. Muzeum Dzieci Polskich – ofiar totalitaryzmu.
Use of this source: Organizacja, Ehrlich, kategorie dzieci, warunki i współczesny bilans muzealny.
-
opracowanie instytucjonalne; przytoczone świadectwo Marii Prusinowskiej-Migacz. Nie miała litości dla polskich dzieci. IPN.
Use of this source: Indywidualny przypadek znęcania się Eugenii Pohl i skazanie.
-
Tomasz Toborek. Obóz przy Przemysłowej w Łodzi – piekło dla najmłodszych. IPN / Przystanek Historia.
Use of this source: Ograniczenia bilansów i krytyka zawyżonych dawnych liczb.
How we assess sources
The evidence base consists primarily of Polish scholarly publications, investigative findings, archives, museums and documented witness accounts. Reliability is assessed through the document’s provenance, scholarly method and the ability to check the finding. Statements by perpetrators and family accounts of perpetrators require especially critical comparison with other material. Two pages from the same institution may repeat one finding; they are not automatically treated as independent confirmation.
Full methodology