English source-aligned edition

Ernst Lautz

sentenced to ten years' imprisonment; released in 1951 1887–1979

Ernst Lautz served as chief public prosecutor at the People's Court in Berlin. The profile reconstructs the person’s function in Berlin, Nazi Germany and Polish territories annexed to the Reich through documented office, decisions, supervision or operational conduct. It does not assign every crime committed by an institution or region to one individual.

JudiciaryLegal repressionDeath penalty

Confirmed findings

  • From 20 September 1939 to the end of the war, Lautz was chief public prosecutor at the People's Court in Berlin.
  • The Justice Trial judgment found that he instructed subordinates to retain before the People's Court those cases in which responsibility for a possible death sentence could be accepted.
  • Trial material examined his role in cases under the decree on criminal law for Poles and Jews and found him guilty of war crimes and crimes against humanity.

Place in the chain of responsibility

The profile shows the prosecutorial stage of the chain of repression: choosing court jurisdiction, preparing indictments and expecting a death sentence. It does not equate Lautz's office with personally issuing every judgment or carrying out every execution.

Key events and mechanisms

  • his assumption of office as chief public prosecutor at the People's Court in September 1939
  • the application of repressive law to Poles and Jews in annexed territories
  • the Nuremberg Justice Trial in 1947
No victim-count ranking

The circle records authority, function and agency. Several profiles may describe different parts of the same persecution chain, so profile-level totals must not be added together.

Postwar accountability

At the Nuremberg Justice Trial, Lautz was sentenced in 1947 to ten years' imprisonment. He was released in 1951.

Limits of the evidence

The surviving records reveal a pattern of prosecutorial activity and some cases, but not the full path of every indictment. The profile does not assume that every case retained by the People's Court ended in the same outcome.

Sources

The source set combines institutional, archival, trial or scholarly material from at least two independent publishers.